Cost of Living

The Big Mac sells for $5.69 in the US and $3.50 in China — a 38% implied yuan undervaluation. Across 173 cities the EIU tracks, Singapore and Zurich top the league; Damascus and Tehran sit at the bottom. Real differences in spending power are smaller than nominal exchange rates suggest.

$5.69
US Big Mac price (Jan 2026)
38%
Implied yuan undervaluation (BMI)
173
Cities in EIU Worldwide Cost survey
0.61
Global average price level (USA = 1.00)

Key insights

🍔

Big Mac index — quick PPP proxy

The Economist's Big Mac index compares the dollar price of a Big Mac across markets to gauge over- or under-valuation versus PPP. Switzerland (8.07 CHF ≈ $9.15) is roughly 60% overvalued vs the dollar; the yuan ($3.50) is 38% undervalued. The index is crude — burgers are non-tradable services and reflect local rents and wages — but tracks broader PPP measures surprisingly closely.

🏙️

City rankings concentrate at the extremes

EIU's 2025 survey put Singapore and Zurich at the top, followed by Geneva, New York and Hong Kong. The cheapest cities are conflict-affected or under heavy sanctions — Damascus, Tehran, Tripoli, Karachi. Among major business hubs the spread between most and least expensive is roughly 2.5×.

🛒

Composition matters more than headline

Headline CPI baskets in advanced economies weight housing 25–35%, transport 12–18%, food 10–15%. In emerging markets food often exceeds 30% of the basket, which is why food shocks hit headline inflation harder. PPP-adjusted incomes give a more honest comparison of living standards than market-rate dollar GDP per capita.

Big Mac Index — selected countries (Jan 2026)

Local price converted to USD at market exchange rate

Key Finding: Switzerland and Norway lead the list at $9+; the yuan, ruble and Indian rupee are deeply undervalued on this metric.

Price level index — selected countries (USA = 100)

ICP-PPP price level, all goods and services

Key Finding: Switzerland, Norway and Iceland trade well above US price levels; most emerging markets sit at 40–60.

Methodology & caveats

PPP vs market exchange rates

Purchasing power parity rates equalize the cost of a fixed basket of goods. Market exchange rates reflect financial flows and are far more volatile. PPP rates change slowly because they reflect underlying productivity differentials. The IMF's WEO publishes both — comparisons of living standards use PPP, comparisons of cross-border trade use market rates.

CPI basket reweighting

National CPI baskets are reweighted every 1–5 years to reflect actual consumer spending. Pandemic-era shifts (less travel, more groceries) prompted accelerated rebasings in 2021–22. Substitution bias — when consumers swap to cheaper alternatives — means traditional Laspeyres indices slightly overstate inflation. Chained indices correct for it.

Limitations of city surveys

EIU, Numbeo and Mercer rank cities by the cost of a basket aimed at expatriate professionals. They don't capture local-resident costs (cheaper street food, lower-rent neighbourhoods). Numbeo crowdsources prices; EIU sends researchers to specified outlets. The two often disagree on rank order but agree on broad clusters.